National Security Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

National Security - Case Study ExampleBut could the guarantor go in the country have d single better in pr stillting these shocking attacks. According to the protector (2006), the reports on the cross party intelligence and auspices military commission into the London terrorists attacks of 7 July 2005 did not acquire any evidence of an intelligence failure that could have prevented the bombings. It further says that it only identified Intelligence gaps. The committee further states that the comparatively small capacity of the sneaking(a) service to conduct conclusive investigations, had also to blessed for the attacks. There have been attempts to protect the security forces from any blame or taking of responsibility of a possible failure on their part to prevent the bombings. However, serious questions arise.The first question is could have the security services known about any planned attacks on the British soil. The MI5, which is Britains domestic spy service, the power re sponsible for gathering intelligence on any internal attacks, insists that it did not have any instruction about the intended bombings. This is supported by the Intelligence and Security Committee Report into the London Terrorist Attacks, which title that the Secret service had no prior randomness on possible attacks in London. It however notes that, one of the attackers Siddequine Khan was known to the Security Service before the attacks. These claims have drawn world wide comment from different individuals, groups and media houses claiming that to the contrary, the security services had prior information about the possibility of an attack from as early on as in 2004 but did not only act appropriately. According to WSWS 2007, there was also apt exemplar by the Saudi-Arabian Arabian Intelligence about a plot to bomb the Britain. This warning was however dismissed by the security forces as irrelevant. The security forces and the government denied this, even though, The Guardian -2006 reports that there was even credible sources form the White House which confirmed the claim. It further claims that the information from the Saudi intelligence was so specific, that it even noted that the plot involved four Islamic extremists and that the target was London. This has since been confirmed by the Saudi Arabias ambassador to the United Kingdom. (WSWS 2007). (WSWS 2007) further reports that the Israelis Secret Intelligence Service had also warned the British security services about possible terror attack in London just a few age before the attacks. The Morning star (2007) also reports that the Saudi and French governments had warned the MI5 about the attacks. It from all these claims, it is probable that the secret service, had information about the possibility of an attack in the United Kingdom (UK) and more specifically on the UKs rail network. It however did not treat these warnings with the proper attention they deserved. According to WSWS(2007) a statement fr om the hence Prime minister, (Tony Blair), which was quoted in the parliamentary report, revealed that the services had been alerted on a possible attack by terrorists who were British Citizens. It also reports that in May 2005, in the same parliamentary report, it is noted that there was security information that attacks similar to the Madrid bombings would be carried out in the United Kingdom. The Secret service has been criticized for having under inspection two of the bombers and taking no serious actions to prevent the